[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120105162519.GE3937@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:25:19 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iwl3945 didn't survive after s2ram failure
On Thu 05-01-12 16:00:41, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 03:19:13PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
> > OK, so I have tried to boot with pcie_aspm=off and the wireless
> > resurrect. The I found out that I booted into 3.2 rather than 3.2-rc6 so
> > I retested with the original kernel and guess what, yes it reported the
> > same problem as before (with or without parameter).
> > So I have tried to retest with few kernels (3.2.0-rc5,
> > 3.2.0-rc6-00005-ga36bfdd, 3.2.0-rc7-00083-g115e8e7 and 3.2.0) that I
> > still had on my machine and 3.2.0-rc6-00005-ga36bfdd seems to be the
> > only affected one.
> > There doesn't seem to be any obvious difference wrt. the driver in the
> > logs (attached).
> >
> > Looking in the history it seems that 497f16f2 [pci: Fix hotplug of
> > Express Module with pci bridges] might be related.
>
> From the changelog of that commit: "I noticed that the bridges get
> assigned but do not get enabled", that looks like the problem we had
> seen.
Yes, I am just wondering why I haven't seen the problem before. I was
using rc6 for quite some time and using suspend/resume cycle all the
time. It was just after suspend didn't survive when I saw the problem
for the first time...
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists