linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: efi: refactor efi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120105181723.GA24242@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Thu, 5 Jan 2012 18:17:24 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: efi: refactor efi_init() a bit

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:11:18AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:

>  	if (memmap.desc_size != sizeof(efi_memory_desc_t))
> -		printk(KERN_WARNING
> -		  "Kernel-defined memdesc doesn't match the one from EFI!\n");
> +		printk(KERN_WARNING "Kernel-defined memdesc doesn't match the "
> +		       "one from EFI!\n");

Just kill this - it's valid per-spec, there's no reason for us to 
complain.

Looks fine otherwise.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/