[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120105183842.GF18486@google.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:38:42 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be
allowed to create io_context
Hello, Hugh.
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:36:21AM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I can vouch that it makes the list_debug.c:53 warnings go away: they
> used to come in half an hour, but I've run on two machines for 10
> hours so far without seeing any.
Yeah, my overnight test is pretty conclusive too. I can usually hit
the bug under 30mins without the patch.
> And I've not yet seen a cfq-iosched.c:2585 with that patch in; but
> those were more elusive - we'll have to run until tomorrow night
> before concluding that it makes those go away too.
>
> Or if you understand the connection between these, and would prefer
> to assume that it fixes them both, and want me to try another patch
> instead (I assume the one I'm running with is a workaround to narrow
> down the issue, rather than an intended fix?), let me know and I'll
> switch over.
Yeap, I can see the connections now and think I know where the bug is
too. I'll, hopefully, be able to post fix soon.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists