[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F060CE2.5090705@synaptics.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:49:38 -0800
From: Christopher Heiny <cheiny@...aptics.com>
To: Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti@...com>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerie de Gram <j.de.gram@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Naveen Kumar Gaddipati <naveen.gaddipati@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/11] input: RMI4 core bus and sensor drivers.
On 01/01/2012 10:38 PM, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> On Thursday 22 December 2011 07:39 AM, Christopher Heiny wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Christopher Heiny<cheiny@...aptics.com>
>>
[snip]
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +static int rmi_bus_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef GENERIC_SUBSYS_PM_OPS
>> + const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
>> +
>> + if (pm&& pm->suspend)
>> + return pm->suspend(dev);
> If driver-pm- suspend is not there should you not fall back to . suspend ?
You're thinking of dev->driver->suspend here, right? If so, that sounds
good to me.
>
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rmi_bus_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef GENERIC_SUBSYS_PM_OPS
>> + const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
>> +
>> + if (pm&& pm->resume)
>> + return pm->resume(dev);
> same here?
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists