lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:58:31 -0500
From:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
Cc:	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...allels.com, neilb@...e.de,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jbottomley@...allels.com, bfields@...ldses.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] NFS: create blocklayout pipe per network namesapce
 context

On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 17:55 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: 
> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 13:10 +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: 
> > This patch set was created in context of clone of git
> > branch: git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6.git.
> > tag: v3.1
> > 
> > This patch set depends on previous patch sets titled:
> > 1) "SUNRPC: initial part of making pipefs work in net ns"
> > 2) "SUNPRC: cleanup PipeFS for network-namespace-aware users"
> > 3) "SUNRPC: make RPC clients use network-namespace-aware PipeFS routines"
> > 4) "NFS: create clients and IDMAP pipes per network namespace"
> > 
> > This patch set is the final part of making SUNRPC PipeFS and it's users work in
> > network namespace context.
> > 
> > The following series consists of:
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Stanislav Kinsbursky (5):
> >       NFS: handle blocklayout pipe PipeFS dentry by network namespace aware routines
> >       NFS: blocklayout pipe creation per network namespace context introduced
> >       NFS: blocklayout PipeFS notifier introduced
> >       NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference from blocklayout routines
> >       SUNRPC: kernel PipeFS mount point creation routines removed
> > 
> > 
> >  fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c    |  154 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.h    |    3 -
> >  fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdev.c |    5 +
> >  fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdm.c  |    7 +-
> >  fs/nfs/inode.c                      |    1 
> >  fs/nfs/netns.h                      |    1 
> >  include/linux/sunrpc/rpc_pipe_fs.h  |    2 
> >  net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c               |   21 -----
> >  8 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> These patches need rebasing in order to apply on top of 3.2-rc7...

OK. Further testing seems to indicate that we're going to have to
postpone merging these patches until the 3.4 merge window.

The problems are twofold:

As the patches stand now in the linux-next tree, they can (and
occasionally do) Oops on unmount. The reason was that I rejected the
PipeFS notifier patch for the idmapper (due to the reported problem of
nfs_idmap_init/nfs_idmap_quit being undefined when CONFIG_NFS_V4 is
undefined), and the fact that it is missing causes the unmount at the
end of our tests to hit the BUG() in fs/dcache.c:905. This suggests that
we will have the same problem with the pNFS block layout driver, since I
still haven't received a rebased update of the 5 'create blocklayout
pipe per network namesapce context' patches.

The second problem that was highlighted was the fact that as they stand
today, these patchsets do not allow for bisection. When we hit the Oops,
I had Bryan try to bisect where the problem arose. He ended up pointing
at the patch "SUNRPC: handle RPC client pipefs dentries by network
namespace aware routine", which is indeed the cause, but which is one of
the _dependencies_ for all the PipeFS notifier patches that fix the
problem.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ