linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] use generic pci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120106083916.9588034bde22a6803e327aa9@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 6 Jan 2012 08:39:16 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] use generic pci_iomap on all architectures

Hi Michael,

On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 08:31:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> [I am not *just* picking on you - others do this as well ...]
> 
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:58:36 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Linus, please pull the following changes for 3.3, thanks a lot!
> > 
> > These changes have been on linux-next for a while now.
> > They touch a lot of arches and have interdependencies, so merging
> > separately seems to make sense, I think.
> > 
> > The following changes since commit 805a6af8dba5dfdd35ec35dc52ec0122400b2610:
> > 
> >   Linux 3.2 (2012-01-04 15:55:44 -0800)
> 
> So why have you rebased this?  All this stuff in in linux-next based on
> v3.2-rc3 since December 5 (and that version will be in linux-next today
> as well unless you update your linux-next branch in the next sort while).

OK, seems I was mistaken (and mislead by the above.  Your for-linus tag
just tags what is already in linux-next and based on v3.2-rc3 ...

Sorry about that.

So why does you pull request refer to "commit
805a6af8dba5dfdd35ec35dc52ec0122400b2610", I wonder?  Is that just what
"git request-pull" produced?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped