[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120105141606.5e19a08b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:16:06 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Edward Shishkin <edward@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Stop clearing uptodate flag on write IO error
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:40:04 +0100
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> for mostly historical reasons we still clear buffer_uptodate flag on write
> IO errors.
I have long and strong memories of never being able to understand why
we did that.
> This is not only semantically wrong (buffer still has correct data
> in it) but it also triggers warnings in mark_buffer_dirty when buffer is
> written again which scares lots of users (as they tend to unplug USB sticks
> too early). This patch series is an attempt to start solving the problem
> by allowing filesystem to tell whether it wishes buffer_uptodate flag cleared
> on write IO error. Ext2 is converted to use this as an example. Eventually
> when all filesystems are converted, we can remove the condition.
>
> Do people think this is a desirable way to go?
>
Linus might have some thoughts.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists