[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120104.223052.902437565229260010.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:30:52 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: Larry.Finger@...inger.net
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linville@...driver.com,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the
net-next tree
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:12:29 -0600
> Is there a good explanation why changes in wireless drivers are sent
> to net-next, and not wireless-testing? If that were stopped, this kind
> of conflict would be avoided.
It was a networking wide change and it's easiest if I just take it
in and deal with the merge issues.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists