[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <NEXT-4f06aa69274cf6.26578607@nextmail.ru>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:01:45 +0400
From: MR <g7af0ec1e3ea1e7b1@...tmail.ru>
To: Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ath9k crash 3.2-rc7
> > > :) no problem. i hope for you can recreate the issue consistently ,
> > > can you please test with the attached patch and another debug patch.
>> > please let me know if there is no panic but there are warnings (or)
>if
> > > there are no warnings (or) the issue still appears(also the trace
> > > thanks) , also if you need any help
> > Should I apply the patch to Linux 3.2-rc7 or 3.2 release?
>Oh, I see. 3.2 release has this fix already. I will build it with
debugging
> patch and report warnings now.
I have some unpleasant news: it looks like it takes slightly longer with the
fix, but the crash still managed to occur with 3.2 and I lack ESP to check
for warnings immediately before that. I thought that 8 hours is enough
testing, heh. It simply took 9 and a half under nigh-ideal conditions
(stable signal from fixed AP with notebook also steadily in one place).
Good news is that I remembered to decrease console font size before the
crash. So now I could see that the long stack trace was just a decoy to
ensure that the first Oops scrolls too far up. I now have photos of the
first one, too.
Process: kworker/u:2 (pid: 1419, threadinfo ffff88013dc38000, task
ffff8800891020d0)
Stack:
ffff88013dc39c10 ffff880136111ae0 ffff880136110460 0000000000000040
ffff880136114000 0000000000000000 ffff88013dc39d20 ffffffffa0560a35
0000000000000001 0000000000000202 ffff8801361140f0 ffff88013ed3ea48
Call trace:
ath9k_config+0x115/0x780 [ath9k]
? queue_work+0x1a/0x20
? queue_delayed_work+0x25/0x30
? ieee80211_queue_delayed_work+0x46/0x60 [mac80211]
? ath9k_flush+0x155/0x1d0 [ath9k]
ieee80211_hw_config+0xe2/0x160 [mac80211]
ieee80211_scan_work+0x243/0x5c0 [mac80211]
? __schedule+0x2d7/0x7b0
? ieee80211_scan_rx+0x1c0/0x1c0 [mac80211]
process_one_work+0x111/0x390
Only after this happens "unable to complete kernel paging request" in
ath_update_survey_stats
worker_thread+0x162/0x340
? manage_workers.clone.26+0x240/0x240
kthread+0x96/0xa0
kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
? kthread_worker_fn+0x190/0x190
? gs_change+0x13/0x13
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists