[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120106003533.GC3790@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 01:35:33 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Surbhi Palande <csurbhi@...il.com>,
Valerie Aurora <val@...consulting.com>,
Christopher Chaltain <christopher.chaltain@...onical.com>,
"Peter M. Petrakis" <peter.petrakis@...onical.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] VFS: Avoid read-write deadlock in
try_to_writeback_inodes_sb
On Thu 08-12-11 10:04:35, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> From: Valerie Aurora <val@...consulting.com>
>
> Use trylock in try_to_writeback_inodes_sb to avoid read-write
> deadlocks that could be triggered by freeze.
Christoph asked about what is the exact deadlock this patch tries to fix.
I don't think you answered that. So can you elaborate please? Is it somehow
connected with the fact that ext4 calls try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() with
i_mutex held?
Honza
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897421
> Signed-off-by: Valerie Aurora <val@...consulting.com>
> Cc: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
> Tested-by: Peter M. Petrakis <peter.petrakis@...onical.com>
> [kamal@...onical.com: patch restructure]
> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index ea89b3f..3a80f1b 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -1274,8 +1274,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb);
> * try_to_writeback_inodes_sb - start writeback if none underway
> * @sb: the superblock
> *
> - * Invoke writeback_inodes_sb if no writeback is currently underway.
> - * Returns 1 if writeback was started, 0 if not.
> + * Invoke writeback_inodes_sb if no writeback is currently underway
> + * and no one else holds the s_umount lock. Returns 1 if writeback
> + * was started, 0 if not.
> */
> int try_to_writeback_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb, enum wb_reason reason)
> {
> @@ -1288,15 +1289,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_to_writeback_inodes_sb);
> * @sb: the superblock
> * @nr: the number of pages to write
> *
> - * Invoke writeback_inodes_sb if no writeback is currently underway.
> - * Returns 1 if writeback was started, 0 if not.
> + * Invoke writeback_inodes_sb if no writeback is currently underway
> + * and no one else holds the s_umount lock. Returns 1 if writeback
> + * was started, 0 if not.
> */
> int try_to_writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb,
> unsigned long nr,
> enum wb_reason reason)
> {
> if (!writeback_in_progress(sb->s_bdi)) {
> - down_read(&sb->s_umount);
> + if (!down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount))
> + return 0;
> if (nr == 0)
> writeback_inodes_sb(sb, reason);
> else
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists