linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] TASK_DEAD task is able to be woken up in special condition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1325847671.2442.7.camel@twins>
Date:	Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:01:11 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Motohiro Kosaki <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] TASK_DEAD task is able to be woken up in special condition

On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 19:22 +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote:
> I just confirmed booting up on my box, and I would like to get rough agreement
> about this way to solve this issue at first. 

I really don't like it. It makes the ttwu path more complex and more
expensive. ttwu is one of the hottest and more complex paths in the
scheduler, it needs neither more overhead nor more complexity.

I'd really much rather put another raw_spin_unlocked_wait() in do_exit()
before we set TASK_DEAD. It probably needs an smp memory barrier too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/