[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4F06F640020000780006ACDE@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:25:20 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: <mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: x86-64: memset()/memcpy() not fully standards compliant
>>> On 06.01.12 at 12:08, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>> It's not the traditional bootmem implementation anymore, but
>> alloc_bootmem() et al still exist, and still clear the allocated memory
>> (in __alloc_memory_core_early()). So there is a code path that can
>> validly be used (and it is this code path that is presenting one of the
>> problems with the non-pv-ops Xen kernels, as they're using flatmem
>> rather than sparsemem since their physical address space is always
>> fully continuous).
>
> Yes but there should be no callers that do alloc_bootmem(4G)
> The biggest ones afak are the 1GB pages I added some time ago.
>
> How is it a problem in the non pv Xen kernels?
pgdat->node_mem_map[] exceeds 4G when total memory goes far
enough beyond 292G. At some later point ->node_page_cgroup[]
also exceeds 4G. Finally, the phys-to-machine mapping (which gets
resized during boot) exceeds 4G when crossing the 2T boundary.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists