[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F0743EE.6080302@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:56:46 -0800
From: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: evdev - Add EVIOC mechanism to extract the
MT slot state
On 01/06/2012 10:18 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:00:22PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I read somewhere in the code of Android a comment in which they
>> complain about not being able to retrieve the slots states. So they
>> assume they are all at 0.
>> So this mechanism is good to have.
>> However, back in January 2011, Dmitry raised the problem that this
>> code was not thread safe.What happens if 2 applications ask for
>> different slots values (let say X.org and utouch-frame)?
>
> 2 different processes should be fine; the problem would be if 2 threads
> of the same process share the same file descriptor. So far the rest of
> evdev copes just fine with multiple threads using the same fd (all
> operations are atomic in this regard), setting ABS_MT_SLOT before
> fetching the state break this property.
How is this any different than two threads trying to set a different
property, like the fuzz factor of an axis? This seems like something
that should be guarded by a lock in userspace, essentially.
-- Chase
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists