linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Input: evdev - Add EVIOC mechanism to extract the MT slot state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120106195846.GA23619@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date:	Fri, 6 Jan 2012 11:58:46 -0800
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>
Cc:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: evdev - Add EVIOC mechanism to extract the MT
 slot state

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:56:46AM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 01/06/2012 10:18 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin,
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:00:22PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >> I read somewhere in the code of Android a comment in which they
> >> complain about not being able to retrieve the slots states. So they
> >> assume they are all at 0.
> >> So this mechanism is good to have.
> >> However, back in January 2011, Dmitry raised the problem that this
> >> code was not thread safe.What happens if 2 applications ask for
> >> different slots values (let say X.org and utouch-frame)?
> > 
> > 2 different processes should be fine; the problem would be if 2 threads
> > of the same process share the same file descriptor. So far the rest of
> > evdev copes just fine with multiple threads using the same fd (all
> > operations are atomic in this regard), setting ABS_MT_SLOT before
> > fetching the state break this property.
> 
> How is this any different than two threads trying to set a different
> property, like the fuzz factor of an axis? This seems like something
> that should be guarded by a lock in userspace, essentially.

>From kernel POV both operations succeed and produce consistent reults.
Consider EVIOCSABS when one thread using the same FD sets range 0-100
and another 200-1000. At no time in the kernel we get to state of
min = 200 and max = 1000. In the end we'll end up with either 0-100 or
200-1000 but not mix of both. So the kernle state is internally
consistent.

With proposed solution one client may request data for slot 2 but
instead get info for slot 5 if another client manages to slide in.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/