linux-kernel - Re: A regression in recent 3.2 kernel: bdi_dirty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 07 Jan 2012 17:35:25 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	Илья Тумайкин 
	<librarian_rus@...oo.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A regression in recent 3.2 kernel: bdi_dirty_limit() divide
 error

On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 22:56 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Subject: 
> Date: Sat Jan 07 22:50:45 CST 2012
> 
> The uninitilized shift may lead to denominator=0 in
> prop_fraction_percpu() and divide error in bdi_dirty_limit().

I'm not seeing how, only proc_change_shift() can change ->index, and it
does that after it writes ->pg[index]->shift.

> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> ---
>  lib/proportions.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> --- linux.orig/lib/proportions.c        2012-01-07 22:50:29.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/lib/proportions.c     2012-01-07 22:50:37.000000000 +0800
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ int prop_descriptor_init(struct prop_des
>  
>         pd->index = 0;
>         pd->pg[0].shift = shift;
> +       pd->pg[1].shift = shift;
>         mutex_init(&pd->mutex);
>         err = percpu_counter_init(&pd->pg[0].events, 0);
>         if (err)
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/