linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] msm: DMAEngine: Add DMAEngine driver based on old MSM DMA APIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 7 Jan 2012 10:54:43 -0800
From:	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
Cc:	Ravi Kumar V <kumarrav@...eaurora.org>, vinod.koul@...el.com,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, arnd@...db.de,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, bryanh@...eaurora.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, tsoni@...lcomm.com, johlstei@...lcomm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] msm: DMAEngine: Add DMAEngine driver based on old
 MSM DMA APIs

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 05:59:29PM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:

> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/msm-dma.c b/drivers/dma/msm-dma.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..51d9a2b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/msm-dma.c
> > ...
> > +static void msm_chan_desc_cleanup(struct msm_dma_chan *chan)
> > +{
> > +	struct msm_dma_desc_sw *desc, *_desc;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +	dev_dbg(chan->dev, "Cleaning completed descriptor of channel %d\n",
> > +							chan->chan_id);
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->lock, flags);
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, &chan->active_list, node) {
> > +		dma_async_tx_callback callback;
> > +		void *callback_param;
> > +
> > +		if (msm_dma_desc_status(chan, desc) == DMA_IN_PROGRESS)
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		/* Remove from the list of running transactions */
> > +		list_del(&desc->node);
> > +
> > +		/* Run the link descriptor callback function */
> > +		callback = desc->async_tx.callback;
> > +		callback_param = desc->async_tx.callback_param;
> > +		if (callback) {
> > +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->lock, flags);
> > +			callback(callback_param);
> 
> Are you sure unlocking here is safe? at_hdmac.c holds the lock the
> entire time, and fsldma.c deletes the entire list, then runs the
> operations.

Good catch.

According to a comment in at_hdmac.c, it is safe to hold the lock
while calling the callbacks, so that's probably the easiest solution.
I suspect that you've got something in another driver expecting the
lock to be released, and that might have to be changed.

I do think the way fsldma.c does it is cleaner, though, since it
allows the lock to be released for longer periods of times.

In either case, it can't be releasing a lock in the middle of a loop
like this.

David

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/