[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1326058974.5372.4.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:42:54 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Please merge two small bug fix patches from linux-next
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 13:26 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> wrote:
> > Below are two patches that have been in linux-next for ages (via akpm's
> > tree). They are prette simple, straight-up, bug fixes. They have been
> > submitted to maintainers multiple times over (IIRC at least the past
> > year), but for some reason the maintainers seem uninterested in picking
> > them up (or even responding to them).
[]
> they seem to have Andrew's sign-off, so I'd have expected them to
> come through Andew. What's up?
>From my perspective, the issue lies with James'
apparent desire to keep scsi tree changes as close
to zero as possible.
Many obvious corrections to scsi defects have gone
unapplied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists