[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h39bqmiuo.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:20:15 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>,
Wolfgang Breyha <wbreyha@....net>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: usb-audio: fix possible hang and overflow in parse_uac2_sample_rate_range()
At Sun, 8 Jan 2012 07:45:09 -0500,
Xi Wang wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:09 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > As of now, I have little time to evaluate, so I might have missed
> > something, but I wonder whether
> >
> > /* avoid overflow */
> > if (nr_rates == KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE / sizeof(int))
> > break;
> >
> > is the best way to check. This looks ugly to me.
> > If we need to limit the number of rates, better to define some proper
> > numbers as the upper limit. And then, it should warn, not only
> > breaking loop.
>
> Thanks for looking into this. Yeah, I agree using something like
> MAX_NR_RATES is better. Is 65535 okay or do we need a larger limit?
It's way too higher than any realistic situation ;)
I guess 1000 or such should suffice.
thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists