[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120108102657.9a5dd6534ea4ae829073ff6e@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 10:26:57 +0900
From: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: fix mov immediate emulation for 64-bit operands
Hi,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2012, at 10:25 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > On 01/07/2012 12:21 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> >> MOV immediate instruction (opcodes 0xB8-0xBF) may take 64-bit operand.
> >> The previous emulation implementation assumes the operand is no longer than 32.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
> >
> > There are exactly two such instructions: MOV immediate (B8-BF) and MOV
> > moff (A0-A3); you may want to check the latter too.
> >
> > -hpa
> >
>
> These instructions (A0-A3) seem to be already covered by the decode_abs function.
Like these how about introducing a new flag and change the following entries in the
decode table to indicate possible 64bit immediate:
/* 0xB8 - 0xBF */
X8(I(DstReg | SrcImm | Mov, em_mov)),
Checking the opcode byte at the operand decoding stage, like below, does not look nice:
(IMO so better ask Avi)
+ if (size == 8 && ((ctxt->b & 0xF8) != 0xB8 || ctxt->twobyte))
size = 4;
I am now cleaning up x86_decode_insn() to make each decoding stage clearer.
Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists