[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F09AFBD.60503@suse.cz>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:01:17 +0100
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefiles: Disable unused-variable warning
Dne 27.12.2011 14:57, Michal Hocko napsal(a):
> Anyway, I am wondering why unused-but-set-variable is disabled while
> unused-variable is enabled.
unused-but-set-variable was disabled, because it was a new warning in
gcc 4.6 and produced too much noise relatively to its severity. A make
W=1 build of x86_64_defconfig gives:
$ grep -c 'Wunused-but-set-variable' log
77
$ grep -c 'Wunused-variable' log
0
More exotic configuration will probably result in a couple of unused
variable warnings, but that IMO no reason to disable them globally.
> Shouldn't we just disable it as well rather
> than workaround this in the code? The warning is just pure noise in this
> case.
If it's noise in a particular case, there is always the option to add
CFLAGS_memcontrol.o := $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-variable)
to the respective Makefile.
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists