linux-kernel - Re: ath9k crash 3.2-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <NEXT-4f0acb7559f2f7.91746772@nextmail.ru>
Date:	Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:11:49 +0400
From:	MR <g7af0ec1e3ea1e7b1@...tmail.ru>
To:	Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	"Rajkumar Manoharan" <rmanohar@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: ath9k crash 3.2-rc7

>> So, I am building 3.2 with two patches: over/under-flow catcher (pity
>that
>> it seems to be on a multiple-times-per-second codepath and just leaving
>the
> > checks there for everyone is suboptimal) and allegedely proper fix. Both
> > applied OK with a small offset.
> 
> as per our assumption, we should not see those over/underflow errors,
> with the patch
> above mentioned. please let us know if you hit upon this warnings,
> even after the proper fix.

2 hours in. It looks like 10%-20% throughput loss (both up and down with 
similar ratio) relative to "remove suspicious code" build. It may be some 
other change, of course (slightly moving the notebook, removing USB device 
charging from the notebook or something like that)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/