lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120109114510.GK21765@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:45:10 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
Cc:	Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-mm-sig-bounces@...ts.linaro.org" 
	<linaro-mm-sig-bounces@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] ARM: IOMMU: tegra: Add iommu_ops for GART/SMMU
	driver

On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:39:48AM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:17:18AM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> >> Just for DMA mapping test from MPU side, the following one is used.
> >
> > This patch is buggy.
> >
> >> +static void dmaapi_test_map_page(struct device *dev)
> >> +{
> >> +     struct page *page;
> >> +     dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> >> +     void *cpu_addr;
> >> +
> >> +     page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +     BUG_ON(!page);
> >> +
> >> +     dma_addr = dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, PAGE_SIZE, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >> +     BUG_ON(!dma_addr);
> >> +
> >> +     cpu_addr = kmap(page);
> >> +     BUG_ON(!cpu_addr);
> >> +     memset(cpu_addr, 0xa5, PAGE_SIZE);
> >> +     kunmap(cpu_addr);
> >
> > The DMA API works like this:
> >
> > - The CPU owns the page or buffer and can access it.
> > - You map the page or buffer.
> > - The device owns the page or buffer; the CPU must explicitly access it.

Sorry, that 'must' should have been a 'must not'.

> I don't understand what  "CPU must __explicitly__ access it" means.
> 
> Do you mean that CPU must access the mapped buffer when
> it __explicitly__ knows that the access does not cause any side effect?

No - I mean that the program must not attempt to read or write the
buffer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ