linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120109121133.76f5b7c4a4780954c4562244@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:11:33 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with Linus' tree

Hi Al,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in
fs/btrfs/super.c between commit 34c80b1d93e6 ("vfs: switch ->show_options
() to struct dentry *") from Linus' tree and commit 2ddeb2a58b11 ("vfs:
switch ->show_options() to struct dentry *") from the vfs tree.

I assume that you sent the correct version to Linus, so I used that.
Please, if you do change stuff just before sending it to Linus also update
your for-next branch.

Then again ... it looks like the vfs tree has other changes to the btrfs
code so that I need the version from the vfs tree, not Linus' tree ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped