[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGsTGOxyTX6Xijvm8UXGjtVTtYg5X5xfJo8D+47o+xU+bA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:17:05 -0600
From: Rob Clark <rob@...com>
To: InKi Dae <daeinki@...il.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk, arnd@...db.de,
jesse.barker@...aro.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
t.stanislaws@...sung.com, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
daniel@...ll.ch
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/2] dma-buf: Introduce dma buffer sharing mechanism
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:10 AM, InKi Dae <daeinki@...il.com> wrote:
> note : in case of sharing a buffer between v4l2 and drm driver, the
> memory info would be copied vb2_xx_buf to xx_gem or xx_gem to
> vb2_xx_buf through sg table. in this case, only memory info is used to
> share, not some objects.
which v4l2/vb2 patches are you looking at? The patches I was using,
vb2 holds a reference to the 'struct dma_buf *' internally, not just
keeping the sg_table
BR,
-R
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists