[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120109155256.GA2288@elliptictech.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:52:56 -0500
From:	Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
To:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modules: sysfs - export: taint, address, size
On 2012-01-07 16:44 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
> Subject: modules: sysfs - export taint, address, size
> 
> Recent tools do not use /proc to retrieve module information. A few values
> are currently missing from sysfs.
[...]
> @@ -907,10 +927,8 @@ static ssize_t show_refcnt(struct module
>  	return sprintf(buffer, "%u\n", module_refcount(mk->mod));
>  }
>  
> -static struct module_attribute refcnt = {
> -	.attr = { .name = "refcnt", .mode = 0444 },
> -	.show = show_refcnt,
> -};
> +static struct module_attribute refcnt =
> +	__ATTR(refcnt, 0444, show_refcnt, NULL);
This change seems unrelated to the patch description, and is not
mentioned in the changelog.  Several instances of this.
[...]
>  static struct module_attribute *modinfo_attrs[] = {
>  	&modinfo_version,
>  	&modinfo_srcversion,
> -	&initstate,
> +	&module_initstate,
Another unrelated change?
>  	&module_uevent,
> +	&module_address,
> +	&module_size,
> +	&module_taint,
You've forgotten to update Documentation/ABI to describe these new
attributes.
Cheers,
-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
