| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1326127761-2723-14-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:49:21 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, acme@...radead.org,
robert.richter@....com, ming.m.lin@...el.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
asharma@...com, ravitillo@....gov, vweaver1@...s.utk.edu
Subject: [PATCH 13/13] perf: add support for taken branch sampling to perf report (v3)
From: Roberto Agostino Vitillo <ravitillo@....gov>
This patch adds support for taken branch sampling, i.e, the
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK feature to perf report. In other
words, to display histograms based on taken branches rather
than executed instructions addresses.
The new option is called -b and it takes no argument. To
generate meaningful output, the perf.data must have been
obtained using perf record -b xxx ... where xxx is a branch
filter option.
The output shows symbols, modules, sorted by 'who branches
where' the most often. The percentages reported in the first
column refer to the total number of branches captured and
not the usual number of samples.
Here is a quick example.
Here branchy is simple test program which looks as follows:
void f2(void)
{}
void f3(void)
{}
void f1(unsigned long n)
{
if (n & 1UL)
f2();
else
f3();
}
int main(void)
{
unsigned long i;
for (i=0; i < N; i++)
f1(i);
return 0;
}
Here is the output captured on Nehalem, if we are
only interested in user level function calls.
$ perf record -b any_call,u -e cycles:u branchy
$ perf report -b --sort=symbol
52.34% [.] main [.] f1
24.04% [.] f1 [.] f3
23.60% [.] f1 [.] f2
0.01% [k] _IO_new_file_xsputn [k] _IO_file_overflow
0.01% [k] _IO_vfprintf_internal [k] _IO_new_file_xsputn
0.01% [k] _IO_vfprintf_internal [k] strchrnul
0.01% [k] __printf [k] _IO_vfprintf_internal
0.01% [k] main [k] __printf
About half (52%) of the call branches captured are from main() -> f1().
The second half (24%+23%) is split in two equal shares between
f1() -> f2(), f1() ->f3(). The output is as expected given the code.
It should be noted, that using -b in perf record does not eliminate
information in the perf.data file. Consequently, a typical profile
can also be obtained by perf report by simply not using its -b option.
Signed-off-by: Roberto Agostino Vitillo <ravitillo@....gov>
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
---
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt | 7 ++
tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt
index 9b430e9..19b9092 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt
+++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt
@@ -153,6 +153,13 @@ OPTIONS
information which may be very large and thus may clutter the display.
It currently includes: cpu and numa topology of the host system.
+-b::
+--branch-stack::
+ Use the addresses of sampled taken branches instead of the instruction
+ address to build the histograms. To generate meaningful output, the
+ perf.data file must have been obtained using perf record -b xxx where
+ xxx is a branch filter option.
+
SEE ALSO
--------
linkperf:perf-stat[1], linkperf:perf-annotate[1]
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
index 25d34d4..fb8194b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
@@ -53,6 +53,50 @@ struct perf_report {
DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_bitmap, MAX_NR_CPUS);
};
+static int perf_session__add_branch_hist_entry(struct perf_tool *tool,
+ struct addr_location *al,
+ struct perf_sample *sample,
+ struct perf_evsel *evsel,
+ struct machine *machine)
+{
+ struct perf_report *rep = container_of(tool, struct perf_report, tool);
+ struct symbol *parent = NULL;
+ int err = 0;
+ unsigned i;
+ struct hist_entry *he;
+ struct branch_info *bi;
+
+ if ((sort__has_parent || symbol_conf.use_callchain)
+ && sample->callchain) {
+ err = machine__resolve_callchain(machine, evsel, al->thread,
+ sample->callchain, &parent);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ bi = perf_session__resolve_bstack(machine, al->thread,
+ sample->branch_stack);
+ if (!bi)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < sample->branch_stack->nr; i++) {
+ if (rep->hide_unresolved && !(bi[i].from.sym && bi[i].to.sym))
+ continue;
+ /*
+ * The report shows the percentage of total branches captured
+ * and not events sampled. Thus we use a pseudo period of 1.
+ */
+ he = __hists__add_branch_entry(&evsel->hists, al, parent,
+ &bi[i], 1);
+ if (he) {
+ evsel->hists.stats.total_period += 1;
+ hists__inc_nr_events(&evsel->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE);
+ } else
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ return err;
+}
+
static int perf_evsel__add_hist_entry(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
struct addr_location *al,
struct perf_sample *sample,
@@ -126,14 +170,21 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
if (rep->cpu_list && !test_bit(sample->cpu, rep->cpu_bitmap))
return 0;
- if (al.map != NULL)
- al.map->dso->hit = 1;
+ if (sort__branch_mode) {
+ if (perf_session__add_branch_hist_entry(tool, &al, sample,
+ evsel, machine)) {
+ pr_debug("problem adding lbr entry, skipping event\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (al.map != NULL)
+ al.map->dso->hit = 1;
- if (perf_evsel__add_hist_entry(evsel, &al, sample, machine)) {
- pr_debug("problem incrementing symbol period, skipping event\n");
- return -1;
+ if (perf_evsel__add_hist_entry(evsel, &al, sample, machine)) {
+ pr_debug("problem incrementing symbol period, skipping event\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
}
-
return 0;
}
@@ -188,6 +239,15 @@ static int perf_report__setup_sample_type(struct perf_report *rep)
}
}
+ if (sort__branch_mode) {
+ if (!(self->sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK)) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "selected -b but no branch data."
+ " Did you call perf record without"
+ " -b?\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+
return 0;
}
@@ -517,6 +577,8 @@ int cmd_report(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __used)
"Specify disassembler style (e.g. -M intel for intel syntax)"),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "show-total-period", &symbol_conf.show_total_period,
"Show a column with the sum of periods"),
+ OPT_BOOLEAN('b', "branch-stack", &sort__branch_mode,
+ "use branch records for histogram filling"),
OPT_END()
};
@@ -537,10 +599,27 @@ int cmd_report(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __used)
report.input_name = "perf.data";
}
- if (strcmp(report.input_name, "-") != 0)
+ if (sort__branch_mode) {
+ if (use_browser)
+ fprintf(stderr, "Warning: TUI interface not supported"
+ " in branch mode\n");
+ if (symbol_conf.dso_list_str != NULL)
+ fprintf(stderr, "Warning: dso filtering not supported"
+ " in branch mode\n");
+ if (symbol_conf.sym_list_str != NULL)
+ fprintf(stderr, "Warning: symbol filtering not"
+ " supported in branch mode\n");
+
+ report.use_stdio = true;
setup_browser(true);
- else
use_browser = 0;
+ symbol_conf.dso_list_str = NULL;
+ symbol_conf.sym_list_str = NULL;
+ } else if (strcmp(report.input_name, "-") != 0) {
+ setup_browser(true);
+ } else {
+ use_browser = 0;
+ }
/*
* Only in the newt browser we are doing integrated annotation,
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists