[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120109205907.GE4198@dastard>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:59:07 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mgorman@...e.de, gregkh@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] shrink_dcache_parent() deadlock
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:30:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Resend would be nice; I can try to dig the series out and rebase it, but...
>
> Here's a TOTALLY UNTESTED rebase of just that single patch from Dave.
>
> I did not check if the rest of the series did something that this
> patch needs, so the patch may be entirely broken, but it does look
> sane on its own (ie I do not see anything obviously broken in it). So
> it still looks like a nice cleanup, but maybe I'm missing something
> subtle, and maybe the rest of Dave's series really is required.
Nothing else is required - that patch is a OK by itself as a bug
fix/cleanup.
> It compiles. That's all I'm going to say about my extensive testing.
> Which is also why I haven't added my sign-off to it.
I did quite a bit of load and stress testing on the series back when
I first posted it, so the dcache changes don't have any problems I
know of.
> Comments?
Looks OK to me.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists