[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201201092315.28230.wolfgang.walter@stwm.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:15:27 +0100
From: Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...m.de>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client bugfixes and cleanups
On Monday 09 January 2012, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Please pull from the "nfs-for-3.3" branch of the repository at
>
> git pull git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs.git nfs-
for-3.3
>
> This will update the following files through the appended changesets.
>
> Cheers,
> Trond
>
>
> commit 074b1d12fe2500d7d453902f9266e6674b30d84c
> Author: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
> Date: Mon Jan 9 13:46:26 2012 -0500
>
> NFSv4: Change the default setting of the nfs4_disable_idmapping
parameter
>
> Now that the use of numeric uids/gids is officially sanctioned in
> RFC3530bis, it is time to change the default here to 'enabled'.
>
> By doing so, we ensure that NFSv4 copies the behaviour of NFSv3 when
we're
> using the default AUTH_SYS authentication (i.e. when the client uses the
> numeric uids/gids as authentication tokens), so that when new files are
> created, they will appear to have the correct user/group.
> It also fixes a number of backward compatibility issues when migrating
> from NFSv3 to NFSv4 on a platform where the server uses different
uid/gid
> mappings than the client.
>
> Note also that this setting has been successfully tested against servers
> that do not support numeric uids/gids at several Connectathon/Bakeathon
> events at this point, and the fall back to using string names/groups has
> been shown to work well in all those test cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
>
Does this mean that one has to modify all one's clients to get the old
behaviour?
I'm not sure if this is a really good idea. I don't see the advantage. This
will break a lot of existing installations when upgrading to >=3.3. And
someone migrating from NFSv3 to NFSv4 has to give some thoughts to it anyway.
Regards,
--
Wolfgang Walter
Studentenwerk München
Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists