[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo4+remnOA6gJXOz_54CsbbcOq_Yj=ua9gV_bq5dZ64ABA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:40:39 -0700
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 9 (arch/x86/pci/amd_bus.c)
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
> on several i386 builds:
>
> amd_bus.c:(.init.text+0x134b): undefined reference to `amd_get_mmconfig_range'
This is my fault. I moved some code from amd_bus.c to amd_nb.c, and builds with
CONFIG_PCI=y
# CONFIG_AMD_NB not set
now fail. The attached patch should fix it. I'll repost the series
("x86/PCI: amd: factor out MMCONFIG discovery") with the fix.
Yinghai, it looks to me like there's no reason to build amd_bus.o
unless we have CONFIG_AMD_NB=y, but speak up if I'm wrong :)
Bjorn
Download attachment "patch.amd-build-fix" of type "application/octet-stream" (874 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists