linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] regulator: Add S5M8767A regulator driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120109234349.GM13679@sortiz-mobl>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:43:49 +0100
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>, lrg@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] regulator: Add S5M8767A regulator driver

On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:37:21PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:08:21AM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:47:04PM -0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > I've not reviwed it yet and there should be no dependency on the MFD
> > > tree so no need to merge it via that - the fact that there's a Kconfig
> > > dependency on the MFD means that the two can get merged in any order.
> 
> > Not only a Kconfig dependency, but also the regulator driver including some of
> > the headers defined in the mfd patch:
> 
> > +#include <linux/mfd/s5m87xx/s5m-core.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/s5m87xx/s5m-pmic.h>
> 
> > So, both need to get merged at the same time.
> 
> No, the point is that the Kconfig dependency means that the code
> dependency isn't an issue 
Right, I missed your point, sorry.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/