[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD2nsn07EaAVzx-=fk1iupxfwZQc-n4O+pq41ceqCJWWDF8fxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:00:32 +0530
From: Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@...il.com>
To: MR <g7af0ec1e3ea1e7b1@...tmail.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: ath9k crash 3.2-rc7
2012/1/9 MR <g7af0ec1e3ea1e7b1@...tmail.ru>:
>
> > > Around 23 hours have elapsed.
> > >
> >> WiFi seems to be working 100% of time. It is always at least lightly
> >loaded.
>
> 45h - all OK.
>
> > great and thanks a lot for testing!
>
> Doesn't really require _doing_ anything except building patched kernels. And
> it is in my best interest to test the driver for the WiFi card I use...
>
> > rather than removing the suspicious code
> > this is properly fixed by us with this patch.
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=132595161516806&w=2
>
> Ah, I saw the message and wondered whether it is the fix I needed and what
> patches should I apply.
>
> So, I am building 3.2 with two patches: over/under-flow catcher (pity that
> it seems to be on a multiple-times-per-second codepath and just leaving the
> checks there for everyone is suboptimal) and allegedely proper fix. Both
> applied OK with a small offset.
as per our assumption, we should not see those over/underflow errors,
with the patch
above mentioned. please let us know if you hit upon this warnings,
even after the proper fix.
>
>
>
--
shafi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists