[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120110083906.GA32252@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:39:06 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Che-liang Chiou <clchiou@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Input: serio_raw - cosmetic fixes
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 04:24:37PM +0800, Che-liang Chiou wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> > Hi Che-Liang,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:03:14PM +0800, Che-Liang Chiou wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Che-Liang Chiou <clchiou@...omium.org>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/input/serio/serio_raw.c | 4 +---
> >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/serio_raw.c b/drivers/input/serio/serio_raw.c
> >> index 4d4cd14..a935c38 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/input/serio/serio_raw.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/input/serio/serio_raw.c
> >> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static ssize_t serio_raw_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
> >> goto out;
> >> }
> >> written++;
> >> - };
> >> + }
> >>
> >
> > I applied this chunk, thanks.
> >
> >> out:
> >> mutex_unlock(&serio_raw_mutex);
> >> @@ -231,11 +231,9 @@ static unsigned int serio_raw_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> >> {
> >> struct serio_raw_client *client = file->private_data;
> >> struct serio_raw *serio_raw = client->serio_raw;
> >> - unsigned int mask;
> >>
> >> poll_wait(file, &serio_raw->wait, wait);
> >>
> >> - mask = serio_raw->dead ? POLLHUP | POLLERR : POLLOUT | POLLWRNORM;
> >> if (serio_raw->head != serio_raw->tail)
> >> return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
> >>
> >
> > This however is not quite correct. I will be applying the patch below
> > instead.
>
> Yeah I was wondering maybe you are going to make use of mask
> somewhere. But still the patch below is quite strange. To my
> understanding the mask is still not used; It is a local variable that
> not does not make any side effect. Do you intend to use that mask on
> any global state or return value?
Right, Milton Miller noticed the same. We should be returning mask,
not 0. I'll fix that up.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists