[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120110124052.GB31611@amt.cnet>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:40:52 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <ostr@...64.org>
Cc: avi@...hat.com, Joerg.Roedel@....com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.2] KVM: SVM: Add support for AMD's OSVW feature in
guests
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:00:35PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@....com>
>
> In some cases guests should not provide workarounds for errata even when the
> physical processor is affected. For example, because of erratum 400 on family
> 10h processors a Linux guest will read an MSR (resulting in VMEXIT) before
> going to idle in order to avoid getting stuck in a non-C0 state. This is not
> necessary: HLT and IO instructions are intercepted and therefore there is no
> reason for erratum 400 workaround in the guest.
>
> This patch allows us to present a guest with certain errata as fixed,
> regardless of the state of actual hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@....com>
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists