[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120110174509.GA30802@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:45:09 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Seiji Aguchi <saguchi@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] tracing: make signal tracepoints more useful
Hello.
Linus, I am asking you to review (and hopefully apply) these
changes, I do not know who else can do this. I do not mean the
implementation, the patches are simple. Just the behavioural
change.
2/2 looks like a bugfix to me, but 1/2 changes the output from
trace_signal_generate() and removes trace_signal_overflow_fail.
In essence the change is:
- TP_printk("sig=%d errno=%d code=%d comm=%s pid=%d",
+ TP_printk("sig=%d errno=%d code=%d comm=%s pid=%d grp=%d res=%d",
where
- grp=0/1 means private or shared
- res is enum {
TRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVERED,
TRACE_SIGNAL_IGNORED,
TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING,
TRACE_SIGNAL_OVERFLOW_FAIL,
TRACE_SIGNAL_LOSE_INFO,
};
Obviously this is the user visible change. But personally I do
agree with Seiji who requested this feature. Currently
trace_signal_generate() just records the fact that __send_signal()
was called, you can't know whether the signal was actually sent
or not.
include/trace/events/signal.h | 85 +++++++++++------------------------------
kernel/signal.c | 28 +++++++++----
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists