lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7A0BFCFE3DA5CD47B0FB7984326F201A134F2CD4F1@BGMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:42:50 +0530
From:	Alok Chauhan <alokc@...dia.com>
To:	Ben Dooks <ben-i2c@...ff.org>
CC:	"khali@...ux-fr.org" <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	"ben-linux@...ff.org" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
	"bones@...retlab.ca" <bones@...retlab.ca>,
	"paul.gortmaker@...driver.com" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	"dgreid@...gle.com" <dgreid@...gle.com>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] i2c: tegra: Add delay before reset the controller

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 04:44:41PM +0530, Alok Chauhan wrote:
> From: Alok Chauhan <alokc@...dia.com>
> 
> In NACK error condition, I2C controller violates clock-to-data setup 
> time before stop. In Software, because of this reset of controller is 
> happening before I2C controller could complete STOP condition.
> 
> Added delay of 2 clock period before reset the controller in case of 
> NACK error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alok Chauhan <alokc@...dia.com>
> ---
> Instead of setting constant value for delay as was in previous patch, 
> now in the current modification delay will be calculated based on clock frequency of the bus.
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c |    8 ++++++++
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c 
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c index 6381604..62e197c 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> @@ -517,6 +517,14 @@ static int tegra_i2c_xfer_msg(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev,
>  	if (likely(i2c_dev->msg_err == I2C_ERR_NONE))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * In NACK error condition resetting of I2C controller happens
> +	 * before STOP condition is properly completed by I2C controller,
> +	 * so wait for 2 clock cycle to complete STOP condition.
> +	 */
> +	if (i2c_dev->msg_err == I2C_ERR_NO_ACK)
> +		udelay(DIV_ROUND_UP(2 * 1000000, i2c_dev->bus_clk_rate));
> +

>Is a delay here good, would it be better to sleep so that some other process can gain cpu time?
We mostly used 100 khz i2c clock frequency and delay in that case will be 20 usec. Would it be 
ok to sleep for such a smaller time? Won't it increase any other overhead?

  	tegra_i2c_init(i2c_dev);
>  	if (i2c_dev->msg_err == I2C_ERR_NO_ACK) {
>  		if (msg->flags & I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK)
> --
> 1.7.4.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" 
> in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo 
> info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
Ben Dooks, ben@...ff.org, http://www.fluff.org/ben/

Large Hadron Colada: A large Pina Colada that makes the universe disappear.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ