linux-kernel - Re: aacraid question: is maximum_num_containers supposed to be minimum?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <8654A042-17CA-4C02-8F34-554ED55B34F4@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:38:55 -0500
From:	Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions <aacraid@...ptec.com>,
	Haogang Chen <haogangchen@...il.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: aacraid question: is maximum_num_containers supposed to be minimum?

On Jan 11, 2012, at 3:28 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> MAXIMUM_NUM_CONTAINERS is consistently used as a minimum not a maximum
> so I was wondering what was up with that?  This is ancient code that
> predates git.

Check out some early discussion. ;-)

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/3/85

- xi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/