lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:52:40 +0100
From:	"Borzenkov, Andrey" <andrey.borzenkov@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Extermeley large PageTables over 500G on kernel 2.6.32.49
 (SLES11 SP1)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:37 PM
> To: Borzenkov, Andrey
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Extermeley large PageTables over 500G on kernel 2.6.32.49
> (SLES11 SP1)
> 
> Le mercredi 11 janvier 2012 à 11:18 +0100, Borzenkov, Andrey a écrit :
> 
> > What can be the reason for system consuming half of physical memory for
> page tables?
> >
> 
> Why dont you use hugepages to map oracle SGA ?
> 

Colleagues responsible for Oracle are reconfiguring it now.

> If not, its normal to eat so much memory for page tables
> 
> grep VmPTE /proc/*/status
> 
> 

Forgive my ignorance. I thought that

1. PTE is 8 bytes per page, which is 4K which gives 2K per 1M of memory
2. All processes sharing the same shared memory share the same page table

So page table for Oracle SGA 500G would be around 1G and shared by all Oracle clients. Is my assumption incorrect?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ