[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120111113428.GA14423@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:34:28 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com>
Cc: Alex Elder <aelder@....com>, xfs masters <xfs-masters@....sgi.com>,
xfs <xfs@....sgi.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] xfs: serialise unaligned direct IOs
> + /*
> + * In most cases the direct IO writes will be done with IOLOCK_SHARED
> + * allowing them to be done in parallel with reads and other direct IO
> + * writes. However,if the IO is not aligned to filesystem blocks, the
> + * direct IO layer needs to do sub-block zeroing and that requires
> + * serialisation against other direct IOs to the same block. In this
> + * case we need to serialise the submission of the unaligned IOs so
> + * that we don't get racing block zeroing in the dio layer.
> + * To avoid the problem with aio, we also need to wait for outstanding
> + * IOs to complete so that unwritten extent conversion is completed
> + * before we try to map the overlapping block. This is currently
> + * implemented by hitting it with a big hammer (i.e. xfs_ioend_wait()).
> + */
> +
This comment is lacking one level of indentation, that's because the old
kernel is missing the split of xfs_file_aio_write that reduces one level
of indentation.
Otherwise the backport looks fine, please send it to
stable@...r.kernel.org, with a [PATCH 0/0] coverletter stating it's for
2.6.35-stable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists