linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] vfs pile 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1326285382.13736.4.camel@tucsk.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:36:22 +0100
From:	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs pile 1

On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 06:58 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:04:30PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Hmm.
> > 
> > Al, Miklos, I just triggered the new inc_link() warning three times in
> > very close succession by just doing a simple
> 
> Also just as expected the set_nlink warnings triggers during XFS log
> recovery (not that I haven't pointed this out multiple times before):
> 
> [ 1702.280003] XFS (vdb2): Starting recovery (logdev: internal)
> [ 1702.294935] set_nlink() clearing i_nlink on xfs inode 320
> [ 1702.297909] set_nlink() clearing i_nlink on xfs inode 256
> [ 1702.301082] set_nlink() clearing i_nlink on xfs inode 192
> [ 1702.304305] set_nlink() clearing i_nlink on xfs inode 321
> [ 1702.306980] set_nlink() clearing i_nlink on xfs inode 257
> [ 1702.308204] set_nlink() clearing i_nlink on xfs inode 193
> [ 1702.309490] set_nlink() clearing i_nlink on xfs inode 322
> [ 1702.311195] set_nlink() clearing i_nlink on xfs inode 258
> [ 1702.313156] set_nlink() clearing i_nlink on xfs inode 194
> [ 1702.315203] set_nlink() clearing i_nlink on xfs inode 323

There are a couple of options:

a) leave it as it is

b) change that set_nlink() in xfs into a 

  if (nlink)
	set_nlink(nlink);
  else
	clear_nlink();

c) remove the printk from set_nlink().  This effectively makes
set_nlink(0) an alias of clear_nlink().

IIRC your preference is c.  What do others think?

Thanks,
Miklos


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/