[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120111150532.GL20739@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:05:32 -0600
From: Ben Myers <bpm@....com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [41/42] xfs: validate acl count
Hi Christoph & Greg,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 07:00:21AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:41:35AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:48:51PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > 3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > Just curious, how well tested are all the patches on 2.6.32 and 3.1 hat I only
> > submitted for 3.0? I'd really prefer if they at least get an xfstest run
> > before they get sent out to the world.
>
> I took these patches on my own as they were reported to fix a public
> vulnerability which was assigned a CVE. They applied with no fuzz and
> "looked correct" so I applied them on my own.
>
> If I shouldn't have, please let me know and I'll drop them.
>
> Otherwise, a nice run of xfstest by someone would be appreciated.
I have a 3.1 test rig and will get this done today, then I'll go after
2.6.32.
Regards,
Ben
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists