| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:05:32 -0600 From: Ben Myers <bpm@....com> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [41/42] xfs: validate acl count Hi Christoph & Greg, On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 07:00:21AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:41:35AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:48:51PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > 3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > Just curious, how well tested are all the patches on 2.6.32 and 3.1 hat I only > > submitted for 3.0? I'd really prefer if they at least get an xfstest run > > before they get sent out to the world. > > I took these patches on my own as they were reported to fix a public > vulnerability which was assigned a CVE. They applied with no fuzz and > "looked correct" so I applied them on my own. > > If I shouldn't have, please let me know and I'll drop them. > > Otherwise, a nice run of xfstest by someone would be appreciated. I have a 3.1 test rig and will get this done today, then I'll go after 2.6.32. Regards, Ben > thanks, > > greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists