linux-kernel - [Question] sched: Should balance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADZ9YHgCc3T1oPJ717+=2CGODqz715qCzwvEobh8yBur4E80Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:10:29 +0600
From:	Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [Question] sched: Should balance_iterator be removed?

Hello all,

Commit 4a55bd5e97b1775913 (sched: fair-group: de-couple load-balancing
from the rb-trees) added balance_iterator in cfs_rq. But, no real use
in current code. Shouldn't it be removed? Or has it been kept for
future use?

Thanks,
Rakib
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/