lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120111014730.GE2414@b20223-02.ap.freescale.net>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:47:30 +0800
From:	Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...escale.com>
To:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
CC:	<patches@...aro.org>, <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <eric.miao@...aro.org>,
	<kernel@...gutronix.de>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] dma/imx-sdma: check whether event_id0 < 32 when set
 event_mask

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:53:23AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:38:39PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:29:42PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:20:10PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:01:50PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > I think it deserves a sensible commit message explaining why the patch
> > > > is needed.
> > > If event_id0 < 32, 1 << (sdmac->event_id0 - 32) is not zero.
> This meant to make you clear about the patch. I'll add it in commit
> message.
unsigned int t = 31;
printf("%d %08x\n", t, 1 << (t-32));

I test above code on both x86 and arm. They shows different results.
x86: 31 80000000
arm: 31 00000000

I think we still need this patch. we shoud not let it depends on gcc's
behavior.

Thanks
Richard
> > > 
> > My point is you may explain the exact problem you are seeing without
> > this patch
> The kernel don't have event_id < 32 case yet. I found the bug when
> I review the code.
> > and how the patch helps here.  In general, doing so would
> > win a warm feeling from reviewers much more easily than leaving the
> > commit message empty there.
> I understand your point that comment as much as possible.
> 
> Thanks
> Richard
> > 
> > -- 
> > Regards,
> > Shawn
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ