[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1326302732.7642.57.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:25:32 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, mingo@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
teravest@...gle.com, slavapestov@...gle.com, ctalbott@...gle.com,
dhsharp@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
winget@...gle.com, namhyung@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] block: block_bio_complete tracepoint was missing
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 10:28 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> block_bio_complete tracepoint was defined but not invoked anywhere.
> Fix it.
>
> -tj: This will generate duplicate BLK_TA_COMPLETEs. Namhyung is
> working on proper solution.
>
> DO_NOT_APPLY
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/bio.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/bio.c b/fs/bio.c
> index b1fe82c..96548da 100644
> --- a/fs/bio.c
> +++ b/fs/bio.c
> @@ -1447,6 +1447,9 @@ void bio_endio(struct bio *bio, int error)
> else if (!test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags))
> error = -EIO;
>
> + if (bio->bi_bdev)
> + trace_block_bio_complete(bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev),
> + bio, error);
I thought I commented before about using TRACE_EVENT_CONDITIONAL() here.
To remove that open coded branch.
-- Steve
> if (bio->bi_end_io)
> bio->bi_end_io(bio, error);
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists