[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F0DCEE5.5090100@parallels.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:03:17 +0400
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
CC: "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
"bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] NFS: create blocklayout pipe per network namesapce
context
11.01.2012 21:46, Trond Myklebust пишет:
> On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 21:23 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> I've sent rebased "v2" of the patch set, contains updated patch "SUNRPC: handle
>> RPC client pipefs dentries by network namespace aware routine", which, I
>> believe, fixes oops, spotted by Bryan (it was caused by excessive call of
>> rpc_put_mount() on PipeFS dentries unlink).
>> So, if I'm not mistaken here, there's no need in implementing of dummy versions
>> of rpc_pipefs_notifier_(un)register() or any other dummy stuff.
>
> OK. Fair enough. We'll give it some testing to make sure that we don't
> hit it again...
>
>> BTW, it looks like that in last 2 days I've sent all updates to the issues you
>> pointed out. If not, please, ping me once more.
>
> I'm in the process of reviewing it right now.
>
Cool, thanks, Trond.
> Cheers
> Trond
>
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists