linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] on general object IDs again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHGf_=oXsrbsXPqBw_CvZQjwdXhzhqkoWX3mRSEgMZHy44ZUKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:29:48 -0500
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] on general object IDs again

>> > Then, you only need to compare. not any other calculation. i.e. only
>> > need id uniqueness.
>> > And any resource are referenced from tasks. so, can you reuse pid for
>> > this? example,
>> > two taska share one mm.
>> >
>> > task-a(pid: 100)
>> >               |-----------------mm
>> > task-b(pid: 200)
>> >
>> >
>> > gen_obj_id(task-b, GEN_OBJ_ID_VM) return 100. (youngest pid of referenced tasks)
>>
>> We can, but determining the youngest pid for an mm struct is O(N) algo.
>> Having N tasks with N mm_structs getting the sharing picture becomes O(N^2).
>
> Yeah, exactly. If not the speed problem we would simply stick
> with Andrew's proposal as two-id-are-the-same(pid1, pid2)
> syscall.

Why O(N^2) is matter? Typical HPC system have mere a few hundred pids.
so, O(N^2)
is not slow. How do you mesure Andrew's proposal?

If you have 1000 pids and each syscall need 10usec,

1000 * 1000 * 10 = 10,000,000usec = 10sec. But, important thing is, almost all
processes don't share fs, mm and other structs. then, if we check
reference count
before task traversal, required time may reduce 1/10x - 1/100x.


> But when we get a number of pids to dump we need the
> resource affinity picture over them all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/