[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1326265453_1662@mail4.comsite.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 01:04:13 -0600
From: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@...a86.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] slub: only IPI CPUs that have per cpu obj to flush
On Sun Jan 08 2012 about 11:28:11 EST, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> flush_all() is called for each kmem_cahce_destroy(). So every cache
> being destroyed dynamically ended up sending an IPI to each CPU in the
ends up
> system, regardless if the cache has ever been used there.
>
> For example, if you close the Infinband ipath driver char device file,
> the close file ops calls kmem_cache_destroy(). So running some
> infiniband config tool on one a single CPU dedicated to system tasks
> might interrupt the rest of the 127 CPUs I dedicated to some CPU
127 CPUs dedicated
> intensive task.
CPU intensive or latency sensitive task.
>
> I suspect there is a good chance that every line in the output of "git
> grep kmem_cache_destroy linux/ | grep '\->'" has a similar scenario.
>
> This patch attempts to rectify this issue by sending an IPI to flush
> the per cpu objects back to the free lists only to CPUs that seems to
> have such objects.
that seem to have
>
> The check which CPU to IPI is racy but we don't care since asking a
> CPU without per cpu objects to flush does no damage and as far as I
> can tell the flush_all by itself is racy against allocs on remote
> CPUs anyway, so if you meant the flush_all to be determinstic, you
required (vs meant)
> had to arrange for locking regardless.
>
> Without this patch the following artificial test case:
>
> $ cd /sys/kernel/slab
> $ for DIR in *; do cat $DIR/alloc_calls > /dev/null; done
>
> produces 166 IPIs on an cpuset isolated CPU. With it it produces none.
>
> The code path of memory allocation failure for CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y
> config was tested using fault injection framework.
>
..
> mm/slub.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 09ccee8..31833d6 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2013,9 +2013,17 @@ static void flush_cpu_slab(void *d)
> __flush_cpu_slab(s, smp_processor_id());
> }
>
> +static int has_cpu_slab(int cpu, void *info)
> +{
> + struct kmem_cache *s = info;
> + struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab, cpu);
> +
> + return !!(c->page);
__flush_cpu_slab is careful to test that the the per_cpu_ptr is not
NULL before referencing the page field. free_percpu likewise ignores
NULL pointers. We need to check !!(c && c->page) here.
[change int to bool assuming you make the change in the other patch].
> +}
> +
> static void flush_all(struct kmem_cache *s)
> {
> - on_each_cpu(flush_cpu_slab, s, 1);
> + on_each_cpu_cond(has_cpu_slab, flush_cpu_slab, s, 1);
> }
milton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists