[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0C475788-593F-46AA-8BE0-274E6765D46D@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:07:09 +0200
From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: Exception during emulation decode should propagate
On Jan 12, 2012, at 2:26 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> (2012/01/12 7:11), Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:53:30 +0200
>> Nadav Amit<namit@...technion.ac.il> wrote:
>>
>>> An exception might occur during decode (e.g., #PF during fetch).
>>> Currently, the exception is ignored and emulation is performed.
>
> Note that the decode/emulation will not be continued in such a case.
>
> insn_fetch() is a bit tricky macro and it contains "goto done" to outside.
> So if an error happens during fetching the instruction, x86_decode_insn()
> will handle the X86EMUL_* fault value and returns FAIL immediately.
You got a point. Yet, a problem still exists.
I now notice I was originally working on previous version (3.0.0)
where the return-code of x86_decode_insn is handled differently.
Nonetheless, I think the current implementation might report emulation
error in such a scenario (instead of triggering #PF/#GP in the guest).
>>
>> When I cleaned up insn_fetch(), I thought that fetching the instruction
>> which is being executed by the guest cannot cause #PF.
>>
>> The possibility that a meaningless userspace might similtaneously unmap
>> the page, noted by Avi IIRC, was ignored intentionally, so we just fail
>> in such a case.
>>
>> Did you see any real problem?
Well, I run some research project for which I emulate instructions quite
often. I do see a real problem with Linux 3.0.0. Please note AFAIK #GP
might occur as well during instruction fetch. I don't think failing is the
right behavior in such case - there is no real reason to fail.
Please tell me whether you are OK with KVM failing in such a scenario.
If not - I'll send an updated patch (in which x86_decode_insn returns
EMULATION_OK when rc == X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT).
Regards,
Nadav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists