lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:29:12 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	manfred@...orfullife.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: avoid checking for constant

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:57:10AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Thursday 2012-01-12 11:54, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> >Le jeudi 12 janvier 2012 à 11:34 +0100, Jan Engelhardt a écrit :
> >
> >> When compiling kernel or module code with -O0, "offset" is no longer
> >> considered a constant, and therefore always triggers the build error
> >> that BUILD_BUG_ON is defined to yield.
> >
> >Why compiling kernel with -O0 is even considered ?
> 
> The compile error was observed when trying to compile an out-of-tree 
> module with -O0.

Hmmm...  Why not have a glue .c file in your out-of-tree module
that contains function like:

	void kfree_rcu_foo(struct foo *fp)
	{
		kfree_rcu(fp, foo_rcu);
	}

Compile this .c file normally, then apply -O0 only to the other
files in your module.

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ