[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1326383950.7642.86.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:59:10 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
lttng-dev@...ts.lttng.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Perf ABI (was: Re: [PATCH 09/11] sched: export
task_prio to GPL modules)
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 10:53 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> That's a stretch in calling version numbers. All but the madvise case
> above are how many parameters it takes, not really a "version" number.
>
> It's adding a new syscall, not updating a version and then deprecating
> the old one. As I believe all the above are still supported.
>
Actually, the madvise1() isn't supported. But this just shows that it
has nothing to do with a version number. What version is madvise()?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists