[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14fc89a6d23764081dc4e94490fdb8ed@farmergreg.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:20:11 -0600
From: Greg Dietsche <gregory.dietsche@....edu>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc: <julia@...u.dk>, <gilles.muller@...6.fr>, <npalix.work@...il.com>,
<rdunlap@...otime.net>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cocci@...u.dk>
Subject: Re: [RESEND 3/3] coccicheck: add parallel execution
On 12-11-11 02:48pm, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 6.11.2011 03:14, Gregory.Dietsche@....edu wrote:
>> + coccinelle $f>/tmp/cocci_parallel_$$_$PARALLEL_ID 2>&1 &
>
> This opens a symlink race.
>
> And this whole parallel execution should be done by make. Just have a
> generic rule for getting result from a single check, make the default
> target depend on the list of the wanted results and concatenate the
> results there. make -j will then take of parallelizing it.
Michal,
Sorry for the slow response - my mail filters weren't behaving well at
all...
For now, lets just drop this patch. I don't have the time to fix it up.
A few months ago I did take a look at what it would mean to use make's
-j option
and it seemed to me that doing so would require completely changing how
the coccinelle
script works.
I would like to see my M= patch set merged though:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/5/94
Thanks,
Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists